On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> Am I looking at a replication bug? It seems to me that once the
> schema was fixed, the replication should have happened. Or am I not
> understanding how SyncRepl works?
This sounds strikingly similar to a bug I've encountered in the past
with delta-syncrepl where the CSN was incorrectly updated after a failed
MOD (due to differences because the replicas had an overlay on that the
master didn't). I've had it on my to-do to really get the logs for this,
but have been busy on other things. I'll see if I can set some time
aside to re-produce this and get the necessary information so it can be
fixed.
Thanks, Quanah; it's nice to know that I'm not alone :-)
In the meantime, I still have the "slapcat" backups around that time if
they're of use to anyone.