Re: overlay order important and not documented?

[Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>]

On 3/16/07 2:58 PM, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Howard Chu wrote:
>
> > Yes, and that's probably the cleanest behavior. The overlay stack is 
> > only supposed to be executed completely for operations that came from 
> > the frontend. Any overlay on the stack should go through any other 
> > overlays below it, but not through any that are above it.
>
> However, the accesslog would be unusable for replication; I see the 
> point: refint should be present on the shadow as well, and do locally 
> refint modifications, right?

I disagree!  Since the only modifications that arrive at the replicas 
(or shadows) came from the master.  I should be able to set up the 
overlays for unique and refint on the master and be done with it.  I 
should not have to waste the cpu cycles on each of the replicas to 
perform the same operations that were already figured out and done on 
the master ldap server.

--
Frank Swasey                    | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator        | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont           |    just like everyone else.
  "I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature