Re: Disaster recovery question wrt replication

[Tony Earnshaw <tericssonearnshaw@barlaeus.nl>]

Buchan Milne wrote:

> If you're sticking with 2.2.13 for "vendor support", judging by the version 
> number, I'm guessing that is with a vendor that now has their own LDAP 
> server, and they primarily use OpenLDAP for the library (to support ldap 
> clients).
>
> We use that vendors distro, but run our own packages (rebuilt from the 
> Mandriva SRPMs since I maintain those myself).
>
> My older (2.3.27) set is available here:

FWIW we're running 2.3.30 rpms (with great success) on RHAS4 with an 
older Buchan Milne spec file than "My older (2.3.27) set", simply by 
modifying the version number in the spec file.

Upgrading from 2.2.13 to 2.3.latest has to be a must for RHAS/RHEL/FC, 
if any RHAS/RHEL/FC admin wishes to take OpenLDAP seriously. Both 
bugs/limitations and functionality have been addressed between 2.2.13 to 
2.3.latest.

--Tonni

--
Tonni Earnshaw
tonni @ barlaeus.nl