Re: misc.schema bundled with OpenLDAP - recommended?

["Gavin Henry" <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>]

<quote who="Tony Earnshaw">
> Gavin Henry wrote:
>
>> I notice that misc.schema says at the top:
>>
>>  20 # Not recommended for production use!
>>  21 # Use with extreme caution!
>>
>> This definitely the case?, as I wanted to use 'nisMailAlias' and
>> 'rfc822MailMember' from it, but not sure now.
>>
>> I've done our own schema ages ago with
>> suretecMailAlias/suretecMailAliasMember, so might stick with that, but
>> wanted to use a bundled schema for most things.
>>
>> Should we stick with our own for Mail Aliases, or use bundled?
>
> We've been using it in production for (literally) years with no
> problems; I guess somebody should remove those two lines, I never
> noticed them ...

Is an ITS the best place?

Cheers.

>
> --Tonni
>
> --
> Tonni Earnshaw
> tonni @ barlaeus.nl
>