[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldap replication half functional

To: Sergio Shevtsov <sergioshev@yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: Re: ldap replication half functional
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:16:03 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@openldap.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20061029050914.8186.qmail@web30909.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <20061029050914.8186.qmail@web30909.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

--On Sunday, October 29, 2006 2:09 AM -0300 Sergio Shevtsov <sergioshev@yahoo.com.ar> wrote:

Hello again.
I'm using  Debian Serge 3.1 (testing) with Ldap that come by default.
You suggest the use of syncrepl intstead of slurpd is better.
But i steel dont understand why slurpd fails. I just create another
backend.
Why syncrepl y better instead of slurpd?
Thanks for your time.


Please keep replies to the list.

syncrepl is better because it understands doing replication from multiple backends very easily, while with slurpd, you can do it, but it is more difficult. slurpd is being deprecated and will eventually be removed from OpenLDAP as syncrepl is a superior replication mechanism.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

Prev by Date: Re: ldap replication half functional
Next by Date: Re: ldap replication half functional
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread