Re: Migrating from 2.0.21 to 2.3.19 on Fedora 5

[Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>]

Dennis Misc wrote:
> I just wanted to be clear..  So it's worse off in having an outdated 
> master,
> than having an outdated slave. I've also browsed through the faq-o-matic,
> and there doesn't seem to be a replication guide between different 
> versions
> of OpenLDAP. (specifically *2.0.21 to 2.3.19*).
>
> If I somehow missed it, please let me know if you happen to have a 
> link/copy
> of the docs.
>
> thanks,
> Dmisc
> **
>
> > >Since the 2.0 system is the master and the 2.3 is the slave,
> > >isn't it possible this would be a non-issue?
> >
> > Then have a worse issue.  The master won't generate
> > all the operational attributes required by the slave.
> >
> > - Kurt
As noted here 
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200604/msg00134.html 
OpenLDAP 2.3.20 and newer will generate the missing operational 
attributes, so it will accept replication from any previous version.

--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
 Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/