[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Replication between 2.2.x and 2.3.x

To: FRLinux <frlinux@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Replication between 2.2.x and 2.3.x
From: "matthew sporleder" <msporleder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:16:48 -0400
Cc: "OpenLDAP software list" <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Content-disposition: inline
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DSG5sUQwBDB656VDA5St8azWXu/PJ6q3Da1/ZFbMtHVg8B6Mg1z+ahx3GoonpPmYKC2via38dWim7J1pMFZ92VIfVgK5BWLpzM805RRO/CWN9z1Drx7QbmFtqFrfcH94bEx2VMdoRkAckERM87QUdaUC4fG2zYxJBJShAUAdIi8=
In-reply-to: <a8139f990605310438p261c7f3bo7ba4a02cf6e0c796@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a8139f990605310438p261c7f3bo7ba4a02cf6e0c796@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/31/06, FRLinux <frlinux@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

We've been toying around quite a bit with 2.3 and we are very close to
move our master to the latest 2.3.x. Now the issue is that we have
slaves still using 2.2.x and as far as we can tell, it looks like it
is unhappy about trying to replicate from 2.3.x to 2.2.x.

Is there a way around this ?


Try upgrading your replicas first.

References:
- Replication between 2.2.x and 2.3.x
  - From: FRLinux <frlinux@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Replication between 2.2.x and 2.3.x
Next by Date: Re: slapadd "backend_destroy" problem
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread