[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9
From: "Matthew J. Smith" <matt.smith@uconn.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 09:20:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <5FC369C1526C5A6A8BF6466B@tribes2.stanford.edu>
References: <CACDABC13A5876498401637C1FA4A254E10EE1@orion.anidirect.com> <49D813F770393865BB32B533@tribes2.stanford.edu> <a8139f990605101451x120daba2l4a3aaca49cf10853@mail.gmail.com> <5FC369C1526C5A6A8BF6466B@tribes2.stanford.edu>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051227)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ok, I'll bite -- which one ?  I can't seem to find anyone with truly
up-to-date OL packages.

> This statement of course excludes any distro that actually works to keep
> their distribution up to date, of which I think I can name 1...
> 
> --Quanah


- --
Matthew J. Smith
matt.smith@uconn.edu
University of Connecticut ITS
PGP Key: http://dotmatt.uconn.edu/matt.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD4DBQFEYzoiUtSvppOnag8RApKzAJdiZM6rPqq9yObHiztvsAmHOzH3AKCOILYp
le9QbYStSpQ/v8BmzbaAoQ==
=LNF5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

References:
- LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9
  - From: "Marc Suttle" <marc.suttle@anidirect.com>
- Re: LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9
  - From: FRLinux <frlinux@gmail.com>
- Re: LDBM VS. BDB on OpenBSD 3.9
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: radius backend
Next by Date: Re: Fwd: How to turn on logging for ldap library
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread