[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Missing/dropped indices?

To: Mark Mcdonald <mmcdonald@staff.iinet.net.au>
Subject: Re: Missing/dropped indices?
From: Michael StrÃder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 09:07:16 +0200
Cc: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <5B0731A8753509478386ED3D6513B2D1AE1D84@isp-per-exch01.win2k.iinet.net.au>
References: <5B0731A8753509478386ED3D6513B2D1AE1D84@isp-per-exch01.win2k.iinet.net.au>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060417

Mark Mcdonald wrote:
> 
> We have recently deployed some new servers running Debian Sarge
> (OpenLDAP 2.2.23) while our older systems are running Debian Woody
> (OpenLDAP 2.1.30).

2.2.23 is not new, it's historic. You have to expect weird problems and
almost no support for these ancient OpenLDAP versions.

You should deploy 2.3.21.

Ciao, Michael.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Missing/dropped indices?
  - From: Timur Izhbulatov <TimurIzhbulatov@oilspace.com>

References:
- Missing/dropped indices?
  - From: "Mark Mcdonald" <mmcdonald@staff.iinet.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Berkeley and OpenLDAP whit group over 5000 memberUser
Next by Date: Re: Missing/dropped indices?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread