[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: multiple subordinates and shm_key - not a good idea
Quoting matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>:
> On 4/27/06, matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, my initial read testing showed equal performance for shm vs
> non-sham (mmap?). And my write test didn't seem to be working at all,
> but that could be something with how I tried to setup slamd. I will
> pursue this issue a little more, and see if I can come up with an ITS.
> (I'll probably just stick with non-shm, though)
Okay. I haven't tested non-SHM with BDB 4.4.20 yet, but I'd be surprised if
it behaved differently than BDB 4.2.X did, which was terrible in comparison
to using SHM. I may be able to get some slamd numbers on it later next
week.
> Can I move away from shm without reimporting my database? Something
> like delete that config and then db_recover/restart openldap?
> (possibly delete my log.* and __db*)
stop slapd
change slapd.conf
db_recover -h <databasedir>
start slapd
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITS/Shared Application Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html