[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: master slave ldap server

To: mallapadi niranjan <niranjan.ashok@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: master slave ldap server
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:18:27 +0100
Cc: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <73e979680603150706n2e99dc2auc09453c5cd8809f1@mail.gmail.com>
References: <73e979680603142321p7dd3c825jb2c1c936603191ce@mail.gmail.com> <b0459d5c0603150455w4dd536c2w7ad58e9b86f8f42a@mail.gmail.com> <73e979680603150706n2e99dc2auc09453c5cd8809f1@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060310 SeaMonkey/1.5a Mnenhy/0.7.3.0

mallapadi niranjan wrote:

Hi matthew
we are using slurpd,
my query is
1) will the slave discard the updates when the master ldap server is down.

A slave never processes user updates. It returns a referral to the client; it is up to the client to do the right thing with the referral.


--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.  http://www.symas.com
 Director, Highland Sun        http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 OpenLDAP Core Team            http://www.openldap.org/project/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: master slave ldap server
  - From: "mallapadi niranjan" <niranjan.ashok@gmail.com>

References:
- master slave ldap server
  - From: "mallapadi niranjan" <niranjan.ashok@gmail.com>
- Re: master slave ldap server
  - From: "matthew sporleder" <msporleder@gmail.com>
- Re: master slave ldap server
  - From: "mallapadi niranjan" <niranjan.ashok@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: master slave ldap server
Next by Date: Re: OpenLDAP performance vs. PostgreSQL
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread