[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
From: Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:30:21 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <FDADBEE1369764ADDC3F625A@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu>
References: <20060314134041.GA20662@m1.intdus.retail-sc.com> <FDADBEE1369764ADDC3F625A@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.7i

On Tue Mar 14 2006 at 19:13:35 CET, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> 
> delta-syncrepl would probably be your best bet.  Normal syncrepl has much 
> larger bandwidth requirements than slurpd or delta-syncrepl.

Do you have pointers to documentation? Neither FAQoMatic or admin guides carry
the term "delta-syncrepl". 

	-JP

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
  - From: Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com>
- Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Synchronization to distant locations over high-latency/low-bandwidth
Next by Date: Re: Openldap doesn't build shared libraries
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread