Re: auditlog overlay in 2.3.18

[Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>]

Howard Chu wrote:
> Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> >   
> Since it overlapped significantly with the slurpd replog code I had 
> wanted to consolidate the two, but there was no high priority to get 
> that done. Also the accesslog overlay generally seemed to be more 
> useful, so we focused on that.

Ah, so perhaps, I'm out in left field, but I'm looking at a scenario 
with a nightly "slapcat and reset auditlog" procedure -- then the 
slapcat ldif plus the auditlog ldif can be used to "quickly" rebuild a 
standalone ldap server that doesn't have replica's.

Perhaps, there is something better for that scenario, but if the 
customer doesn't want a second LDAP server, I get scared about data loss.

Frank