[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: OL 2.3.18 syncrepl vs slurpd

To: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>, Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>
Subject: Re: OL 2.3.18 syncrepl vs slurpd
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:01:31 -0800
Cc: OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <Pine.SOL.4.58.0601191600420.956@toolbox.rutgers.edu>
References: <43CFE9B1.8070104@uvm.edu> <Pine.SOL.4.58.0601191600420.956@toolbox.rutgers.edu>

--On Thursday, January 19, 2006 4:01 PM -0500 Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu> wrote:

   Anyone have any insight to what I've done wrong or where I should
start looking?
Have you considered delta syncrepl? Look in the tests directory.


I note that Symas has a tech tip available on setting up delta-syncrepl:

<http://shawm.symas.net/forums/viewforum.php?f=25>

There is also a tech tip there discussing the pros and cons of the different replication mechanisms.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Product Engineer
Symas Corporation
Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP:
<http://www.symas.com>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OL 2.3.18 syncrepl vs slurpd
  - From: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>

References:
- OL 2.3.18 syncrepl vs slurpd
  - From: Francis Swasey <Frank.Swasey@uvm.edu>
- Re: OL 2.3.18 syncrepl vs slurpd
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Client not getting reply from slapd-ldap proxy
Next by Date: Re: Client not getting reply from slapd-ldap proxy
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread