[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 [ was Re: Berkeley DB versions ]

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>
Subject: Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 [ was Re: Berkeley DB versions ]
From: "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@cise.ufl.edu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:18:32 -0500
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <072AF00A5E35BE9767952199@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu>
Organization: University of Florida CISE Department
References: <C4992E33CD0575030F3A1E4D@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu> <072AF00A5E35BE9767952199@cadabra-sw.stanford.edu>

On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:47:18 -0800
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com> wrote:

> #define REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD 1
> 
> with
> 
> #undef REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD
> 
> then proceed with the make process.
> 
> Run your ldapsearch test, and report the results.  I believe this will 
> change the behavior so that Linux performs as well as, or better than, 
> Solaris 10 x86.

It seems to have knocked about 10 seconds off each query, but still about
3x slower than Sol10x86.

Jim

Follow-Ups:
- REPLACE_BROKEN_YIELD [was Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 ]
  - From: Ron Grant <rgrant@shuttle.net>

References:
- Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 [ was Re: Berkeley DB versions ]
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 [ was Re: Berkeley DB versions ]
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Which version of openldap is "rock solid"!
Next by Date: Re: Comparing OpenLDAP on Linux 2.6/Sol 10 [ was Re: Berkeley DB versions ]
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread