[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Referral results sent with an empty scope and filter
- To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: Referral results sent with an empty scope and filter
- From: Damiano Albani <damiano.albani@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:23:33 +0100
- Content-disposition: inline
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=uJKRZwv70HTM9OlOdHvYvhwNgz7HsJN2i2561BNMl6RaAHvcOKlQnMlhi4QMV3+11q4pasOoO04+pBbBG0wDCWiOYeqm+Gzag9CrjmiidBCL86qE79Rz+woIe7t+H18s1ZnCD5bhz7LfCJt96VIGQCdqO4cKHeRCZTpP0eP3g/Y=
Hello,
I have added a 'referral' entry (RFC3296) in my directory but,
apparently, slapd doesn't return exactly the same thing as I put in.
Even though I didn't specify a scope or a filter, the reply URL
contains '??' at the end, i.e. an empty scope and filter.
For example, the LDIF contains :
ref: ldap://foo.bar/dc=foo,foo=bar
but is returned as :
ldap://foo.bar/dc=foo,dc=bar??
Why isn't the referral entry sent back verbatim ? Is it "RFC-compliant" ?
I ask this because, at the moment, Mozilla refuses to follow referral
URLs which contain a scope of a filter.
<http://groups.google.com/group/netscape.public.mozilla.directory/browse_frm/thread/8cf16d64b8b00eca>
Cheers,
--
Damiano ALBANI