[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: which version to consider "stable?"

To: John Madden <jmadden@ivytech.edu>
Subject: Re: which version to consider "stable?"
From: LALOT Dominique <lalot@univ-aix.fr>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:46:09 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <33722.10.0.14.46.1136815479.squirrel@mail.ivytech.edu>
References: <33722.10.0.14.46.1136815479.squirrel@mail.ivytech.edu>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)

2.3.16 solves many problems. Strange to keep 2.3.11 as "stable". Look at the CHANGES file. You will see many patches for crash and so on..

John Madden a écrit :

...It certainly isn't 2.3.11, right?  I ask because I'm getting tons of crashes
lately (now that I've gone production on 2.3.11, of course!) and I've got to get
something done about it obviously, but I'm hoping that my issues may be resolved
in the later releases.  Can we trust 2.3.16 more than 2.3.11?

Thanks,
 John

-- Dominique LALOT Ingénieur Système Réseau CISCAM Pole Réseau Université de la Méditerranée http://annuaire.univmed.fr/showuser.php?uid=lalot

Follow-Ups:
- Re: which version to consider "stable?"
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

References:
- which version to consider "stable?"
  - From: "John Madden" <jmadden@ivytech.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: which version to consider "stable?"
Next by Date: syncrepl and glue
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread