On Thursday 05 January 2006 01:53, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: > --On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 3:46 PM -0800 Ron Grant > > <rgrant@shuttle.net> wrote: > > I really only need to know if anyone has any idea what it is trying to > > write when it fails with a "ber write failed"? I've already "worked > > around" one bug in syncrepl (the one about not creating glue entries) and > > would be happy to work around this problem while syncrepl stabilizes. I'm > > MUCH more comfortable using the "stable" release..... > > The sad fact here, though, is that "stable" is really a misnomer if you are > using it to guide what you run in production. It is simply the most proven > release to be marked stable since the last "stable" release. Unfortunately, plain 2.3.11 is pretty bad, especially on linux with a 2.6 kernel ... it is rather counter-productive to have it listed as stable IMHO (even if linux is only one of many platforms supported). Regards, Buchan -- Buchan Milne ISP Systems Specialist B.Eng,RHCE(803004789010797),LPIC-2(LPI000074592)
Attachment:
pgpq3Gti4Yt3L.pgp
Description: PGP signature