[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Some syncrepl questions

To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Some syncrepl questions
From: Andreas Grabner <a.grabner@bfi-burgenland.at>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:41 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <A4B987D9513D92C0FC6EE303@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>
References: <1133433164.3600.13.camel@sprint150> <43901E50.5030808@symas.com> <A4B987D9513D92C0FC6EE303@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu>

Hi,

> > Plain syncrepl uses more network bandwidth than slurpd. Delta syncrepl
> > may be a better choice here.
> 
> And you need 2.3.13 for delta-syncrepl.

Sorry i'm a little confused right now! I can not find some
Documentation. Does ist work stable?

BTW bdb 4.2.52.2 +patch or 4.3 or 4.4? Some say yes some say no ;-)

Thanks 

Andreas Grabner

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Some syncrepl questions
  - From: Andreas Grabner <a.grabner@bfi-burgenland.at>
- Re: Some syncrepl questions
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- Some syncrepl questions
  - From: Andreas Grabner <a.grabner@bfi-burgenland.at>
- Re: Some syncrepl questions
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: Some syncrepl questions
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: question regarding ldap_unbind.
Next by Date: Update question with chain overlay of sync replica
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread