Re: Stability OL 2.3.11?

[Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org>]

On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 11:39 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'd like to upgrade OL to 2.3.11, because of the greatly extended 
> functionality WRT 2.2.  I've been running 2.3 on my RHAS3/RHAS4 test 
> servers for months and have found both 2.3.9 and 2.3.11 to be stable and 
> fine, do everything I want, and with GQ I can GUI-change all olc 
> configuration parameters that I wish on the fly. Great :)
> 
> I'd be very grateful for others' (especially Quanah's and Buchan's) 
> comments on 2.3 patch level 9-11 with patched BDB 4.2.52's stability in 
> production before I definitely go ahead. It's a fine product, I've 
> gained enough experience with it, and I'd like to give it its head.
> 

Hi Tony,

I've been testing OL 2.3 from 2.3.7 to 2.3.11 with patched BDB 4.2.52 on
four Debian Linux Sarge boxes. We've got about 1,500 entries so far (not
as many as the other guys). Tested especially ppolicy, syncrepl,
SSL/TLS.

2.3.11 seems to be stable for me.
We'll go into production with this version.

Sam