On 9/9/05, Jon Roberts <jon@jonanddeb.net> wrote:
Marc Boorshtein wrote:
> 1. Yes, the batting average on JLDAP (and JDBC-LDAP) has not been
> good. I've tried my best to keep up, but have not been getting any
> support from novell.
I'm aware Novell contributed JLDAP, but as I understand it the code is
now part of the OpenLDAP source tree and so I wouldn't assume Novell
necessarily has any responsibilities. When there last was Novell support
it appeared to come from overseas outsourcing (I could be wrong).
Watching their stock ride this year, I'd guess they are a little busy
focusing on shareholder value
Novell still owns the copyrights, so it's their code.
If the project needs developers, I'm right here with a body of work that
absolutely depends on JLDAP (and which I will gladly offer to contribute
to OpenLDAP through the appropriate channels when I'm satisfied it's
ready). Unfortunately, submitting more patches doesn't seem to be what
you need now.
Help is allways appreciated!
> 2. The dependencies issue was fixed. If you do not have the
> appropriate libraries to support DSMLConnection or SPMLConnection then
> those classes are skipped durring the compile.
Thank you for this. I've been ignoring the relevant files for a while,
so I didn't notice. Also, when I originally pointed this issue out:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200505/msg00218.html
...it was never acknowledged as being a problem :(
Yes, I can understand the frustration. I'm a voulenteer, so I
have to find time to work on this stuff in my very rare free time :-(
Thanks for not taking my venting/feedback personally. Let me know what I
can do.
No prob, Lord knows I've gotten frustrated enough with the same problem before too! :-)
Jon Roberts
www.mentata.com