Howard Chu wrote:
Of course, referrals and chaining are probably the worst-performing way to accomplish what you want.
Seems like any other way will lead to additional database (of type relay, ldap or meta) per served suffix. Or maybe slapo-glue or slapo-rwm will help here?
Glueing subordinates is an obvious approach. (Note that early 2.3 releases changed the glue syntax from the one used in OpenLDAP 2.1-2.2. The current 2.3.7 release restores the old syntax, and slapo-glue is no longer a separate module. It is integrated back into the slapd core, just like it was in OpenLDAP 2.1 and 2.2.) The relay database would be a good alternative. Either one should work well for this situation.
p.
SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497