[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: LDAP Replication/update dn entry

To: Moe <moe_w90@yahoo.com>, OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: LDAP Replication/update dn entry
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:27:51 -0700
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <20050823190239.80810.qmail@web51409.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20050823190239.80810.qmail@web51409.mail.yahoo.com>

--On Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:02 PM -0700 Moe <moe_w90@yahoo.com> wrote:

i tried dn.base, dn.subtree and dn.exact but i have the same problem

Then your ACL isn't correct, or your process isn't binding correctly. I suggest setting loglevel 256 and seeing what is happening when slurpd tries to replicate to your slave.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LDAP Replication/update dn entry
  - From: Moe <moe_w90@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: LDAP Replication/update dn entry
  - From: Moe <moe_w90@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: LDAP Replication/update dn entry
Next by Date: WSAENOBUFS
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread