Re: ldap_add: Internal (implementation specific) error (80)

[Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>]

Joao Pereira wrote:

> Shouldn't multimaster work??????

it is not guaranteed

> ive compilled with --enable-multimaster.....

good it still compiles...

> and would need it working like that

in any case, you cannot use the updatedn to directly write to a 
multimaster.  writes by the updatedn must come from the replication 
agent, and they are supposed to contain the structuralObjectClass along 
with other non-user modifiable data.  If you write with that identity, 
writes do not propagate to other masters in the pool.  Otherwise, how do 
you suppose a multimaster pool doesn't get into an endless replication loop?

p.


   SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497