Hi,
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
I did a slapcat on the provider and the consumer . Counted the number of dns. They match.Hi,
I think replication is working now.
On what basis do you state this?
But some ou(s) are still shown missing by GQ, JXplorer and LDAP Browser.
On the other hand, when I do a ldapsearch for the entries under those ou(s) , they are present! :)
If the entries __under__ those OUs are present, then the OUs must be present as well (unless for some reason they're "glue" entries).
Yes, true. This behaviour was quite strange to me as well.
II have the graphical browsers and ldapsearch (CLI) installed on the same client.
suspect ACL issues: are you sure those OU entries on the consumer are
readable by your clients, and on the producer by the replication identity?
-- Saket