[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: slapd/slurpd sporadic replication
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Subject: Re: slapd/slurpd sporadic replication
- From: Brent Franks <brentfranks@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:06:35 -0400
- Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Content-disposition: inline
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tJ0SSdYDEw0sv3AQXytPSahbVMEpKCk+LV/rnEWLyB0JFMfo1Z71MPM2XIbG9iaExBetT+Zgp1n89jPHdcl9CXRC2H0TcSwSaKBlcsXIFh3NcRLLW/5nvsolzFXc+XkjpSxdpc04lh3iVaTtuGSCzP5+TcGm4PbLAlR0JVf0uzw=
- In-reply-to: <C777372E705CBE71DE904C2D@0.1.0.4>
- References: <e8dcc66d050629093914a9de04@mail.gmail.com> <A47C7970C000FB301076A524@0.1.0.4> <e8dcc66d050630142663ff2011@mail.gmail.com> <C777372E705CBE71DE904C2D@0.1.0.4>
>
> Have you tried running slurpd -d -1 to see what it reports?
>
> Have you looked at the slave to see if slurpd is trying to connect, but
> failing?
I looked at the slave and it is not trying to connect. It appears
that the changes will *eventually* be replicated. I guess I will just
put up with the eventual changes, or transition to syncrepl
Thanks,
-brent