[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slapd/slurpd sporadic replication

To: Brent Franks <brentfranks@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: slapd/slurpd sporadic replication
From: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:18:04 -0400
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=f28sl50OAYDypfHy5Cq9UWKbrJxLanf+NTES1DIaAFt74iJFy0zFMvI2LoINOSJMc/T1+5Zg7RxHZMWiHafPI0skFbGDUqwY93Vg9KiE5ukVk8x5V+f4aSXJ8M+1zR6CdUwr55MBCVzHnsA7wRdPvK4zpXiEeqMAmZJ0JG0zQT0=
In-reply-to: <e8dcc66d050629093914a9de04@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e8dcc66d050629093914a9de04@mail.gmail.com>

The replog size is zero because slurpd finished processing all of the
entries inside of it.  Try a tail -f on that file and then make a few
changes to see some stuff roll through it.

If your changes are not showing up on the replica, you should have
.rej logs or some other sort of log that mentions why your changes
were not replicated.

> It should also be noted that the time stamp on the master-slapd.replog
> is changing to the time I execute the ldapmodify.  The length of the
> file is 0 however.
> 
> I googled this issue and saw that there were two or three other people
> experiencing the same problem back in 2001, but there were follow ups
> to those posts.

References:
- slapd/slurpd sporadic replication
  - From: Brent Franks <brentfranks@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: proxy auth and who am i
Next by Date: RE: slurpd trouble
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread