[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Comparing slapcat output

To: "Howard Chu" <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: Comparing slapcat output
From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:29:11 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: "Jan-Piet Mens" <jpm@retail-sc.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=sys-net.it; c=simple; q=dns; b=BUco0+XLd27RyMA5cA5Lp73AF7aHH2TvVUOkdOUP90xixXZEe+7qJ0wth20ZDeQjT 07+dgtbGpUcbrHF+WZZQA==
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <42C169FE.2020201@symas.com>
References: <20050628061008.GA18873@m1.intdus.retail-sc.com> <47795.131.175.154.56.1119968285.squirrel@131.175.154.56> <20050628142653.GA12040@m1.intdus.retail-sc.com> <47857.131.175.154.56.1119970209.squirrel@131.175.154.56> <42C169FE.2020201@symas.com>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1

> slapd is hardcoded to generate DNs in this form for SASL/EXTERNAL over
> ldapi. It's been like this for a long time now, since release 2.2.13.
> (See daemon.c...)

Sure, I was missing that bit of code.  Hardcoded by hardcoded, I don't see
any issue in hardcoding it the other way round, since DN normalization has
been established long ago as well, so we don't need to re-normalize stuff.
 Should I proceed?

p.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it


    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497

References:
- Comparing slapcat output
  - From: Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com>
- Re: Comparing slapcat output
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: Comparing slapcat output
  - From: Jan-Piet Mens <jpm@retail-sc.com>
- Re: Comparing slapcat output
  - From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: Comparing slapcat output
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: One small question
Next by Date: pb inserting row in LDAP directorie
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread