[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: openldap 2.3 recommended bdb version

To: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: openldap 2.3 recommended bdb version
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:10:02 -0700
Cc: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>, OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <b0459d5c05062408102f24cc14@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20050622102621.U158@mail.doris.name> <FFAD4F9EE6CC742F68E11940@10.0.0.1> <Pine.SOL.4.58.0506230939100.6679@toolbox.rutgers.edu> <42BB432C.30801@symas.com> <b0459d5c05062408102f24cc14@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8b2) Gecko/20050621

matthew sporleder wrote:

 How much of the patchet for bdb4.2 has been implemented/bypassed by
 bdb4.3? I would like to get a lab going with openldap2.3/bdb4.3 if
 the necessary parts of the 4.2 patchset were taking upstream by
 sleepycat.

Sleepycat did not use any of our code; they fixed the bug in 4.3 in a different way. But that's really irrelevant, all that matters is that this particular transaction initialization bug does not occur in BDB 4.3. (Though unfortunately, it appears that other bugs have been introduced in 4.3 that have yet to be fully identified.)

--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
 http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support

References:
- openldap 2.3 recommended bdb version
  - From: Dusty Doris <openldap@mail.doris.cc>
- Re: openldap 2.3 recommended bdb version
  - From: Aaron Richton <richton@nbcs.rutgers.edu>
- Re: openldap 2.3 recommended bdb version
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: openldap 2.3 recommended bdb version
  - From: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: SyncRep - 1 provider : n consumer [auf Viren überprüft]
Next by Date: Re: candidate entry 75 does not match filter
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread