[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
ldbm migrations
- To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Subject: ldbm migrations
- From: matthew sporleder <msporleder@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 18:39:57 -0400
- Content-disposition: inline
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=e1uEWeeFuou45dyEu6hrqHjo1p2K3ADqkKWOotdcY1RFWapNknHB7zvaYHMwIbzKBqm33W/z/TdzxlSvx3UFYxg/7x5bKJMQtqVHM40bnAIJGQ8IezauDEcCQ+mMwKXIbMZZwLtNs5UwiyTPvW2MsChWvYgTdOsrACnSFeCScZU=
How does moving from an older version of BerkleyDB to a newer version
affect ldbm backends? Will I have to do some sort of db_upgrade, or
will the newer library not affect ldbm? I don't see any berkley
libaries linked when I try ldd on slapd.
--
_Matt