[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: partial replication?

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: partial replication?
From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 09:49:42 -0500
Cc: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>, OpenLDAP Software <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <4277B186.8050407@symas.com>
References: <4277A416.6010906@pbl.ca> <4277A8A2.9030208@sys-net.it> <4277B186.8050407@symas.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.4.1.centos4 (X11/20050323)

Howard Chu wrote:

In OpenLDAP 2.2 syncrepl filtering support is unreliable, it will not correctly issue Delete requests for entries whose values have dropped out of the filter. This feature only works correctly in 2.3/HEAD.

I was thinking abuot this, and will be playing with it for next week or so. I'm wondering if there's workaround for this on 2.2.

For example, what happens if I define ACL on master (instead of using filter on the slave) so that slave can see only entries it needs to replicate? When entry falls off the ACL, would than slave delete it (reliably)? Would it work at all?

--
Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>    Pollard Banknote Limited
Systems Administrator                           1499 Buffalo Place
Tel: (204) 474-2323 ext 276                     Winnipeg, MB  R3T 1L7

References:
- partial replication?
  - From: Aleksandar Milivojevic <amilivojevic@pbl.ca>
- Re: partial replication?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: partial replication?
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: URI Question
Next by Date: Incompatible version.. How come? (openldap2.2.26+bdb-4.2.52)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread