Re: Sync Replication searchbase muset be a suffix of a db?

[Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>]

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

> > Things go smooth if the searchBase in the consumer is equal to the suffix
> > (but subtree deletion fails because of ITS#3385, fixed in HEAD.
> >    
>
> On a related note: if using refreshOnly, context suffix deletion at the
> producer side results in no deletion at the consumer's side.  I guess that
> when refreshing after deletion at the provider side, the consumer is
> supposed to get noSuchObject, which results in no further action.  Is this
> intended, or should the consumer decide to commit suicide as soon as it
> gets noSuchObject from the provider?
Good question. I guess the most useful behavior would be for the 
consumer to delete the entry and keep on with its usual refresh 
schedule, in anticipation of a new entry taking its place on the provider.

In HEAD, if a persist session runs into this situation, the persistent 
search is terminated with a SyncRefreshRequired error code. Of course, 
in this case, the next Refresh would probably fail.

--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
 http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support