[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ACI?
Pierangelo Masarati writes:
>Ted Kaczmarek wrote:
>>Is openldap with aci enabled still considered development?
>
> (...) In 2.3, some effort is being put in determining if they
> suffer from deadlocking, and apparently they don't; I cannot say the
> same for erlier releases because no such testing has been done
> consistently, AFAIK.
I thought that was 'access ... by set='. It's 'by aci' too?
--
Hallvard
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ACI?
- From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
- Re: ACI?
- From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- References:
- ACI?
- From: Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@optonline.net>
- Re: ACI?
- From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>