[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm

To: reinhard.sojka@parlinkom.gv.at
Subject: Re: Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:38:02 -0800
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <1111430721.11654.37.camel@edv4>
References: <1111430721.11654.37.camel@edv4>

At 10:45 AM 3/21/2005, Reinhard Sojka wrote:
>a few other notes on this topic:
>Linux clients do not care about the database backend
>ldapsearch is always working as expected
>OpenLDAP 2.1.x doesn't share these Problems 

This implies that the Solaris client is doing something
different than ldapsearch(1) and these other clients.
You should investigate this, possibly by carefully
examining the server logs for differences.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm
  - From: Sojka Reinhard <reinhard.sojka@parlinkom.gv.at>

References:
- Solaris 9 LDAP client - different behaviour with back-bdb and back-ldbm
  - From: Reinhard Sojka <reinhard.sojka@parlinkom.gv.at>

Prev by Date: Re: slapd: Too many open files
Next by Date: Re: Uid with '+' sign ?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread