Re: registeredAddress, postalAddress and homePostalAddress trouble

[Pascal BOYER <pascal@linuxorable.net>]

Quoting Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>:

> --On Thursday, February 10, 2005 6:17 AM +0100 pascal@linuxorable.net wrote:
>
> > "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> a écrit :
> >
> > > Various list matching rules are not implemented, hence any
> > > assertion of these rules will evaluate to Undefined.
> > So, you think that postalAddress is not implemented ?
> > I found that curious, because it is commonly used.
>
>
> No, the substring index rule for postalAddress is not implemented.
>
>
> specifically for this case:  caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch

Sorry, I'm realy not a LDAP master.
Then, does "caseIgnore<index>Match" means the index is not defined ?
and if that true, does it means I can't do a search on the related attribute ?

Pascal
> --Quanah
>
>
>
> --
> Quanah Gibson-Mount
> Principal Software Developer
> ITSS/Shared Services
> Stanford University
> GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
>
> "These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
> than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
> fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
> faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.