[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch

To: Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com>, OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 14:01:35 -0800
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <ffa2dce1050203131610b8c9e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ffa2dce1050131140173edc2ff@mail.gmail.com> <E29DBA72B20D4D7CD7EBFEF4@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <ffa2dce105020105354564ac2f@mail.gmail.com> <2D06D99A3449DB0302B3506B@10.0.0.1> <ffa2dce10502020811216cb197@mail.gmail.com> <ffa2dce1050203131610b8c9e@mail.gmail.com>

--On Thursday, February 03, 2005 4:16 PM -0500 Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com> wrote:

Just an FYI - I recompiled Cyrus SASL 2.1.20 against MIT 1.4 (with
mutexes disabled, as recommended by Quanah), and slapd doesn't
segfault anymore. Now I guess I need to determine whether or not it
will be stable enough to use, of if I should switch to Heimdal
libraries, as Quanah also recommended. Does anyone else have good
experience one way or the other?

I've been using Heimdal since deployment of OpenLDAP (starting with 2.1.6 or something like that), and it has been quite stable and fast.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

References:
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com>
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com>
- Re: 2.2.23's slapd segfaults when using ldapsearch
  - From: Greg Petras <gpetme@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: monitor backend ruins operational attributes search?
Next by Date: Re: OpenLDAP proxy to AD
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread