Good day,
Thanks for your reply!
> Is LDAP Sync Replication considered stable on OpenLDAP, or should we
> instead be using traditional slurpd replication?
My own opinion is I would wait for OpenLDAP 2.3 to use
syncRepl. Note that
a number of bugs I discovered in syncRepl in 2.3 were fixed
in OL 2.2.20 as
well by Howard Chu, so you may want to look at upgrading.
As I noted in the second half of my message, I did attempt to use 2.2.20,
to great failure.
I would love to give 2.2.20 or even a CVS copy (wouldn't be the first
time) a go, if I could find out why no entries are being replicated with
it. Do those error messages make any sense to anyone?
Thanks also for your advice on syncrepl.