[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Odd problem with open-ldap

To: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: Odd problem with open-ldap
From: Matt <mhoppes@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 13:49:15 -0500
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=bupyxNG0ioWAEv6RdEfJj+y0eNjW8TS5GryMyFAcX7j3BXt3MwQIqWIa5CZEFSbxjq26HP5lYdSPjAAKoZfHo3AF9aV1VMHoSgs7YJLZMGUU+IvqzfIlJy+DceuS/C5uEfvMMjE+59FD6aqet/vjkKZ22UxEB0p9mjSBTx0rs9Q=
In-reply-to: <A04B6AE6ED3BD742B64D5B17093F64E2913082@IMSSGPX01.ims.mhm.mhc>
References: <A04B6AE6ED3BD742B64D5B17093F64E2913082@IMSSGPX01.ims.mhm.mhc>

Wow ok.. now that all that is over.. can anyone explain to me what
might be happening with the ldbm database that is causing it to lock
up or rather just become really slow for that session.. when doing
massive adds/removes?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Odd problem with open-ldap
  - From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>

References:
- RE: Odd problem with open-ldap
  - From: "Tay, Gary" <Gary_Tay@platts.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Building 2.2.19 from source
Next by Date: Re: Building 2.2.19 from source
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread