[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: OpenLDAP upgrade cycle

To: "Matthew J. Smith" <matt.smith@uconn.edu>
Subject: Re: OpenLDAP upgrade cycle
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:52:47 +0100
Cc: OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <1101996304.20274.19.camel@d80h243>
References: <1101996304.20274.19.camel@d80h243>

Matthew J. Smith writes:
> I have noticed, in my short time on this list, that the upgrade cycle
> for OpenLDAP seems to be very short.
> (...)
> *  Are most of you scheduling frequent maintenance windows to stay
> current?

I don't think so.

> *  Is there a version of the OpenLDAP 2.x series that is "stable enough"
> and secure, perhaps at the expense of new features, that I can rely on,
> without having to upgrade for a while?

The "Stable" version in <http://www.openldap.org/software/download/>.
Currently 2.2.17.  When a version is marked Stable, this is announced
on openldap-announce@openldap.org.

-- 
Hallvard

References:
- OpenLDAP upgrade cycle
  - From: "Matthew J. Smith" <matt.smith@uconn.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: [JunkMail] OpenLDAP upgrade cycle
Next by Date: RE: Is it normal?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread