Re: Question about syntax check and back-sql

["Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>]

> Thanks for the detailed answer.
>
>> > It seemed like the current back-sql
>>
>> what's current?  what number?
> I have used 2.2.11.
> I didn't test it with 2.2.18.
>
>> What do you mean by "all"?  All objectClasses and attributeTypes
>> typically
>> loaded into "cn=subschema"?  No, and I don't think it is even
>> reasonable,
>> given the logic that is behind back-sql implementation.  If you mean a
>> somewhat realistic example, the answer is: Yes (see below).
> "All" meant the definition in schema file which openldap supported.

Well, in any case, for each objectClass you intend to map, you need to
explicitly map each attribute.  For instance, if you intend to map
"inetOrgPerson" and "organization", which both allow "description", if you
intend to map the "description" attribute for both objectClasses you need
a "description" entry in table ldap_attr_mappings, and so on.

p.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it


    SysNet - via Dossi,8 27100 Pavia Tel: +390382573859 Fax: +390382476497