[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: version 2.1.29 vs 2.2.13
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Justin Crabtree wrote:
| Our current production servers are running Fedora Core 2 with Openldap
| 2.1.29. We have been having problems getting replication to work
| between them. I setup a couple of test servers running Fedora Core 3
| with Openldap 2.2.13. Replication works without any problems on the
| test servers with the same settings currently not working on production.
| Is there that much difference between these two versions? At this
| point, I am ready to dump 2.1.29 and upgrade to 2.2.13.
I didn't have problems replicating with 2.1.25, 2.1.27, 2.1.29 or 2.1.30
(besides the known issues when replicating multiple DBs to multiple slaves).
But, 2.2 is probably a much better long-term option ...
- --
Buchan Milne Senior Support Technician
Obsidian Systems http://www.obsidian.co.za
B.Eng RHCE (803004789010797)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBlTwWrJK6UGDSBKcRAqfSAJkBV0gtxzV7dfsuDKXCU/Sh5KUiuQCbBf2N
VAQUuEuFGTfFbe6hoMfHVcI=
=9brS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----