Re: Subordinate ACL question

[Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>]

>is an error; I've never tried anything like that, so I don't know if slapd
>happily ignores it or whatever it does in response, but the man page
>clearly states that the <control> field {break|continue|stop} is optional,
>but the <access> field [self]{<level>|<priv>} is mandatory.  I assume
>something like "+0" (i.e. permissions are not altered) is implied, but I
>need to check the code and see if this should become a de-facto defalt
>behavior or it should be explicitly enforced.

So

	by * +0 break

would be more correct?

Looking at aclparse.c it appears that "break" is supported both before
and after <who>.

-- Luke

--