Re: [Fwd: Re: replication problem]

[Dave Horsfall <daveh@ci.com.au>]

On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:

> > How are you binding to the master?  If you're binding as the updatedn,
> > then I'd expect to see that behaviour i.e. changes not being propagated.
> 
> The master should have no knowledge of the updatedn (except for seeing
> that identity in the "replica" directive; but that's only parsed by
> slurpd...).  Unless he's doing something weird, e.g. having an "updatedn"
> directive in the master as well, and using that to modify the database...

Yes, that's what I'm thinking.

> > Either that, or your Perl script is doing something really weird...
> 
> In this case, provided the changes operated by the script succeed, one
> should see some activity at the .rej side...

I was wondering whether he was modifying some operational atttributes
(assuming that's possible).

-- 
Dave Horsfall  DTM  VK2KFU  daveh@ci.com.au  Ph: +61 2 8425-5508 (d) -5500 (sw)
Corinthian Engineering, Level 1, 401 Pacific Hwy, Artarmon, NSW 2064, Australia