[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: small problem building 2.2.17 with BerkeleyDB.4.2



--On 19 October 2004 22:52 +0800 "Tay, Gary" <Gary_Tay@platts.com> wrote:

LD_LIBRARY_PATH is specific to Solaris. "vi /etc/ld.so.conf; ldconfig" is
the RedHat equivalent."man ldconfig" for more info.


I'd already edited ld.so.conf and run ldconfig

I think there were past discussions on "BDB version mismatch" issue in
the MailList and FAQ that Alex could search.

Found 2 entries relating to BDB mismatch in the archive and I'd already tried building BDB with the --with-uniquename option
But, thanks to this list i've got a lot of other things to try now
many thanks
alex 
Gary

	-----Original Message-----
	From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org on behalf of Buchan Milne
	Sent: Tue 10/19/2004 8:06 PM
	To: ando@sys-net.it
	Cc: Alex Sharaz; openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
	Subject: Re: small problem building 2.2.17 with BerkeleyDB.4.2
	
	

	Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
	> You didn't check the real cause of your problem in config.log, did
you?  I 	> suspect you also need to set CPFLAGS=-I<path to berkeley
headers>; also, 	> the library paths uually go in LDFLAGS; I don't know
where LDPATH comes 	> from, maybe I'm missing something...
	
	It should be LD_LIBRARY_PATH, since in 2.2.x, configure tries to run the
	compiled program (IIRC in 2.1.x it did just tried to link it).
	
	Regards,
	Buchan
	
	--
	Buchan Milne                      Senior Support Technician
	Obsidian Systems                  http://www.obsidian.co.za
	B.Eng                                RHCE (803004789010797)
	




Sent using Mulberry 3.1.2