Re: Cannot Index uniqueMember ( uniqueMemberMatch)

[Michael Franken <michael@franken.ws>]

Hi,

Is this support already implemented, or has anyone succesfully used a workaround 
(e.g. using distinguishedNameMatch instead of uniqueMemberMatch)?

Michael

Kurt wrote:

> At 09:20 AM 3/30/2004, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > The problem is that uniqueMember doesn't have an equality matching rule in the schema.
>
> uniqueMember does have an equality matching rule, uniqueMemberMatch.
>
> The problem is simply that indexing support for this equality
> matching rule is not yet implemented.  Patches welcomed.
>
> Kurt