[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: SSF and binds
Dieter Kluenter wrote:
Is there any way in OpenLDAP 2.2.x to say the following:
1) binds must occur over sessions with an SSF of at least 63
2) UNLESS the peer is 127.0.0.1 (in which case a lower SSF is
acceptable)
Yes that is posible, in principle. But I would use ldapi instead of
localhost. The socket has a build-in ssf of 71.
Is it possible to *assign* connections from/to a specific peer an SSF?
The systems or network administrator knows what connections are secure
and what ones aren't. If I route traffic from my LDAP primary to my
secondary over a dedicated link, I may want to assign that link an SSF
of, say, 40, or 71 - or whatever.
It should be up to me or my network administrator.
I raised this issue on the ldap bugs list, but phrased some things in
a way that made the request look like I simply didn't understand what
I was asking for, and Kurt rightly pushed me over to this list.
So I'd like to ask here: Am I making sense?
--
Richard L. Goerwitz III Email: Richard.Goerwitz@Carleton.edu
Phone: +1 507 646 5526 Fax: +1 507 646 4537
PGP key fingerprint: 4471 B6D3 57CC B2DC A0CF 82D3 0B7D EA19 F425 B0E0