[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Master replication server reliability

To: Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>
Subject: Re: Master replication server reliability
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 11:32:41 -0700
Cc: Openldap list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>, James Courtney <Jcourtney@inphonic.com>
In-reply-to: <1092491612.6468.27.camel@localhost>
References: <6991EE283F61E04A957B5368C5765577250133@camail02.ipcfcdom.inphonic.com> <1092491612.6468.27.camel@localhost>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040714

Tony Earnshaw wrote:

fre, 13.08.2004 kl. 19.41 skrev James Courtney:
We're using 2.2.1 still as that was current when we started our project. Do you know of any performance issues with 2.2.1 vs. later version or any real concrete reasons to consider an upgrade?

2.2.1 was a beta release. The first public release of OpenLDAP 2.2 was 2.2.4. Definitely 2.2.1 is a poor choice....


Yep, many.

Just upgrade ;)

I mean why not just run RH's standard 2.0.27 as it was 3 years ago? What
was wrong with MSDOS 6 anyway? Why aren't you runnin RH7? It was good
enough then.

--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
 http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support

References:
- RE: Master replication server reliability
  - From: Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: AI_ADDRCONFIG in libldap/os-ip.c on solaris9
Next by Date: Re: AI_ADDRCONFIG in libldap/os-ip.c on solaris9
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread