--On Thursday, July 29, 2004 10:30 AM +0200 Sensei <senseiwa@tin.it>
wrote:
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 17:46, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Actually, you could do that in 2.1, too...
Should be. I tried (on a debian) but it seems to me to have some kind of
problems, so I'm still with 2.0 :( (2.2 is too young for my opinion)
Hm, well I've moved to 2.2 for Stanford's directory service, and it has
been fine. If you use the same features as you did in 2.1, you'll find
2.2 a lot faster (especially where kerberos binds are involved). I
highly recommend looking at 2.2. I spent about 3 months testing 2.2
before moving off to 2.1.