[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: What's the differences between slapadd and ldapadd?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
|> You can use ldapadd to populate a
|> new/empty database if you really want to, there's not much performance
|> difference between it and slapadd these days.
|
|
| There can be based on whether or not you have transaction logging and
| log file creation enabled though. ;)  On a sufficiently fast system
| (3GHz) it is true I don't see much difference between the two.

But since transaction logging settings affect both slapadd and slapd,
the performance difference is mainly network overhead and load imposed
by other clients.

Regards,
Buchan

- --
Buchan Milne                      Senior Support Technician
Obsidian Systems                  http://www.obsidian.co.za
B.Eng                                RHCE (803004789010797)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFA8ovarJK6UGDSBKcRAq7VAJ49fuUoaKi7HQ9u/5Zwuk20I1vOkACgiTCj
Uz9oSAFb4r6ZdnBJPS/0+Rw=
=nDKp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----