Re: postalAddress index? and recommendation

[Daniel Henninger <daniel@unity.ncsu.edu>]

Hrm, 2.1.30 is what I was running and it yelled at me when I tried to
index on eq.  Oh well.  I've applied a patch to make it work as a normal
substring match.  I may consider implementing true list functionality if
the openldap developers are interested.  (ie, generating a true patch, not
a stopgap)

Daniel


> Hi all,
>
> was indexing on this attribute one week ago. At least eq works with
> 2.1.30
>
> Best regards, vadim tarassov.
>
> On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 16:59, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > --On Friday, June 18, 2004 10:02 AM -0400 Daniel Henninger
> > <daniel@unity.ncsu.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > I can not set an index on it.  (nor does it seem to
> > > search properly unindexed)  I've tried eq, sub, and approx indexes and
> > > they all give me:
> > > /local/ldap/etc/openldap/slapd.conf: line 105: approx index of attribute
> > > "postalAddress" disallowed
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > Did you do:
> >
> > index postalAddress eq,sub
> >
> > or
> >
> > index postalAddress eq
> >
> > or
> >
> > index postalAddress sub
> >
> > and they all gave you that error?
> >
> > Or did you just do:
> >
> > index postalAddress eq,sub,approx
> >
> > (where I would expect to see that error).
> >
> > --Quanah
> >
> > --
> > Quanah Gibson-Mount
> > Principal Software Developer
> > ITSS/Shared Services
> > Stanford University
> > GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
>
>

-- 
/\\\----------------------------------------------------------------------///\
\ \\\      Daniel Henninger           http://www.vorpalcloud.org/        /// /
 \_\\\      North Carolina State University - Systems Programmer        ///_/
    \\\                   Information Technology <IT>                  ///
     """--------------------------------------------------------------"""